ارائه الگوی هسته دانا ـ شبکه توانا برای نقش آفرینی دانشگاه ها در مدیریت دانش نظام مسائل تمدن نوین اسلامی مبتنی بر اندیشه امام خامنه ای مدظله العالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت

نویسندگان

1 استاد، دانشکده هوش مصنوعی و علوم شناختی، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

دانشگاه‌ها برای ایفای نقش در تمدن‌سازی دو ماموریت اصلی را برعهده دارند که عبارتند از:1) تربیت مدیران و کارشناسان و 2) تولید فکر و دانش. جمهوری اسلامی ایران به عنوان هسته اصلی تمدن نوین اسلامی برای انجام این ماموریت ها نیازمند تعامل علمی دانشگاه با جامعه و صنعت برای شناسایی نظام مسائل خود می باشد. در همین راستا تحقیق حاضر با هدف ارائه چارچوبی برای شبکه سازی دانشی و مدیریت دانش دانشگاه ها جهت ایفای نقش در تمدن سازی انجام شده است. این تحقیق از نوع توسعه ای بوده و با روش تحلیل مضمون انجام شده است. منبع اصلی جمع‌آوری اطّلاعات جهت کُدگذاری، مجموعه بیانات و مستندات مکتوب رهبر معظم انقلاب ازطریق جست‌وجوی کلیدواژگان و متن‌خوانی انجام شده است. بر این اساس پس از غور در داده‌ها، 77 مضمون پایه و 13 مضمون سازمان دهنده و 3 مضمون فراگیر شامل «هسته دانا»، «شبکه توانا»، «آفت‌ها» و «نتایج و پیامدها» به شکل نقشه‌ی شبکه (تارنما)، نمایش داده می‌شود. نتایج تحقیق حاضر نشان می دهد هسته دانا در دانشگاه تراز انقلاب اسلامی شامل مولفه های مراکز علم و فناوری، پردیس های مدیریت و راهبری، تجاری سازی و انتقال فناوری، و مطالعات آینده پژوهی، نوآوری و مدیریت دانش بوده و شبکه توانای آن در حوزه دستیابی به کادر علم و فناوری شامل شبکه دانشگاه، شبکه نخبگان و فرهیختگان، شبکه دانشمندان و شبکه شرکت های دانش بنیان می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting the model of a wise core - a capable network for the Role-Playing of universities in the knowledge management of modern Islamic civilization issues based on Imam Khamenei's thought

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohmmad Reza Hassani Ahangar 1
  • Ruhollah Tavallaei 2
  • Mohammed Hossain Shadmanfar 3
1 Professor, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Sciences, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Management and Economics, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

To play a role in civilization, universities have two main missions, which are: 1) training managers and experts and 2) producing thought and knowledge. The Islamic Republic of Iran, as the main core of the modern Islamic civilization, needs the scientific interaction of the university with society and industry to identify its system of problems in order to carry out these missions. In this regard, the present research has been done with the aim of providing a framework for knowledge networking and knowledge management of universities to play a role in civilization building. This research is of developmental type and was done with thematic analysis method. The main source of information collection for coding is the collection of written statements and documents of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution through keyword search and text reading. Based on this, after considering the data, 77 basic themes and 13 organizing themes and 3 overarching themes including "knowledgeable core", "capable network", "pests" and "results and consequences" in the form of a network map (website), display It will be given. The results of the present research show that the knowledge core in Taraz University of the Islamic Revolution includes the components of science and technology centers, management and leadership campuses, commercialization and technology transfer, and future studies, innovation and knowledge management, and its capable network in the field of achievement The science and technology cadre includes the network of universities, the network of elites and scholars, the network of scientists and the network of knowledge-based companies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • University
  • innovation
  • Islamic university
  • science and technology policy making
Abbaszadeh, M., & Abbaszadeh, M. (2012). Validity and reliability in qualitative researches. Journal of Applied Sociology, 23(1), 19–34. https://jas.ui.ac.ir/article_18250.html
Alipour, M. H., & Shadmanfar, M. H. (2021). Orb and field: Step-by-step problem-oriented activities, from problem-finding to problem-solving (2nd ed.). Publications of Saidid (Imam Sadiq University).
Ansari Samani, H., & nafar, F. (2022). Strategies for developing the relationship between university and industry in the country based on the data-based method. Journal of Innovation Ecosystem, 1(4), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.22111/innoeco.2022.41428.1025
Barimani, K., & Enayati, T. (2022). Explain the components that affect the relationship between industry and  University; A step towards an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Development & Evolution Mnagement, 13(47), 61–76. https://jdem.qazvin.iau.ir/article_689447.html
Boyatzis Richard. (1998). Transforming qualitative information : thematic analysis and code development - Plymouth University (Alma). In Qualitative Health Research (Vol. 10, Issue 4).
Büchel, B., & Raub, S. (2002). Building Knowledge-creating Value Networks. European Management Journal, 20(6), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00110-X
Cai, Y. (2019). China-Europe Higher Education Cooperation: Opportunities and Challenges. Frontiers of Education in China, 14(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0009-5
Cai, Y. (2023). Towards a new model of EU-China innovation cooperation: Bridging missing links between international university collaboration and international industry collaboration. Technovation, 119, 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102553
Cai, Y., Ferrer, B. R., & Lastra, J. L. M. (2019). Building university-industry co-innovation networks in transnational innovation ecosystems: Towards a transdisciplinary approach of integrating social sciences and artificial intelligence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174633
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Gimenez, A. M. N., & Bonacelli, M. B. M. (2016). Martin Kenney e David C. Mowery (eds.) - Public Universities and Regional Growth - Insights from the University of California. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v15i1.8649126
Greene, J. R. (2006). Encyclopedia of Police Science: 2-volume set. Routledge.
Han, F., & Ellis, R. (2020). Personalised learning networks in the university blended learning. Comunicar, 28(62). https://doi.org/10.3916/C62-2020-02
Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (1995). Principles for promoting clusters & networks of SMEs. In Small and Medium Enterprises Branch (Issue 1).
Karimi Khozani, A. (2012). The Review of Concept, Administrative Method and Organization Requirements of Problem Oriented Policing. Police Organizational Development, 8(39), 107–128. http://pod.jrl.police.ir/article_9306.html
Kashtkar, M., Mohammadi, A., & Peshwai, M. (2017). Crowdsourcing, pioneers of new business. Industrial Management Organization.
khoshkab, shahrbanoo, & Abili, K. (2023). Reviewing the communication structures of university-industry-government and examining its status in the offices of communication with industry (case of Isfahan University of Technology technical campus (. Journal of Educational  Planning Studies, 11(22), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2023.22560.2074
Li, J., Peng, J., Liu, S., Wang, K., & Li, C. (2020). Toward link prediction in directed social networks based on common interest and local community. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 31(11). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183120501600
Ma, Y., Kong, L., Yang, X., & Lin, C. (2021). Innovation Cooperation Network Evolution about Green Building Technology with Government Intervention: Based on Evolutionary Game Theory. IEEE Access, 9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3119632
Malikpour, K., Delavar, A., & Ghiashi Nadushan, S. (2017). Pathology of the relationship between industry and academia in the field of the humanities. Educational leadership research, 3(11), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.22054/jrlat.2018.7444.1145
Malik Pour Lepari, K., Delavar, A., & Ghiyathi Nedushan, S. (2017). Pathology of the relationship between industry and academia in the field of the humanities. Research on Educational Leadership and Management, 3(11), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.22054/jrlat.2018.7444.1145
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Sabatier, P. A. (2019). Theories of the Policy Process. In Theories of the Policy Process. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689
Saragih, H. S., & Tan, J. D. (2018). Co-innovation: A review and conceptual framework. In International Journal of Business Innovation and Research (Vol. 17, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2018.095542
Serati Shirazi, M., & Khademi, R. (2023). Knowledge flow channels between university and industry: Scientometrics and review study. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2023.8929.1908
Shadmanfar, M. H., alipoor, mohammad hosein, & Makvandi, F. (2022). Extracting the pattern of inhibitors and facilitators of knowledge sharing using metacombination method. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 5(3), 111–150. https://jkm.ihu.ac.ir/article_207546.html
Tavalaee, R., BamdadSufi, J., Rashidi, M. M., Rezaeian, A., & SalehiSadaghiani, J. (2014). Designing a Model for development of Knowledge networks in Research and technology Hub of Oil Industry"Using soft-ThinkingApproach and cognitiveMapping model". Iieshrm, 5(20), 181–200. http://iieshrm.ir/article-1-364-en.html
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2020). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Enhanced eText, 7th Edition. In Managing Innovation.
Towfighi, jafar. (2007). Pathology of University - Industry Relation. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 9(34), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2007.548
Van Toan, D. (2021). Research on the Model of Entrepreneurial University and Advanced University Governance: Policy Recommendations for Public Universities in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4295
Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Li, W., Wang, T., Guo, L., Li-Ying, J., & Huang, J. (2020). Funding research in universities: do government resources act as a complement or substitute to industry funding? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1746189
Yoda, N., & Kuwashima, K. (2020). Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00595-3
Zubașcu, F. (2021, April 1). EU rewrites rulebook on science and technology cooperation with the rest of the world. Sciencebusiness. https://sciencebusiness.net/technology-strategy-board/news/eu-rewrites-rulebook-science-and-technology-cooperation-rest-world