ارائه مدل مفهومی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های حکمرانی دانش سازمانی بر اساس رویکرد سیستمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی با اصالت

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، گرایش مدیریت اطلاعات و دانش، گروه علم اطلاعات و مدیریت دانش، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران.

2 گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت دانش راهبردی دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف تبیین ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های حکمرانی دانش در سازمان با رویکرد سیستمی انجام شده است. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و با روش فراترکیب انجام شده است. در این پژوهش 451 منبع علمی مرتبط در بازه زمانی قبل از سال 2022 از منابع داخلی و خارجی مختلف انتخاب شد و با استفاده از روش فراترکیب و استفاده از «برنامه مهارت‌های ارزیابی انتقادی» (CASP)، در نهایت 105 پژوهش علمی در راستای هدف پژوهش مورد ارزیابی و بررسی قرار گرفتند. در این خصوص، با به‌کارگیری رویکرد سیستمی و با استفاده از روش کدگذاری باز، کدهای مربوطه در سه مقوله اصلی شامل ورودی، فرایند و خروجی، شناسایی و استخراج گردید. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که ورودی مدل شامل چیستی حکمرانی دانش سازمانی (رویکرد، ماهیت و موضوع) است. همچنین فرایند حکمرانی دانش سازمانی شامل ملزومات، عوامل مؤثر، موانع و ابزارها هستند. خروجی مدل حکمرانی دانش سازمانی به دست آمده نیز شامل کارکردها و دستاوردها است. موضوع (مدل مفهومی حکمرانی دانش سازمانی) و رویکرد (رویکرد سیستمی) پژوهش حاضر جنبه نوآورانه و منحصر بفرد دارد. نتایج پژوهش حاضر می‌تواند تسهیلگر پیاده‌سازی حکمرانی دانش در سازمان‌ها باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting a conceptual model of dimensions and components of organizational knowledge governance based on a systemic approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yaser Faizolahy 1
  • Alireza Noruzi 2
  • mehran keshtkar 3
1 Ph.D. student of Information and Knowledge Management, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management of the University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Strategic Knowledge Management, Higher National Defense University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

This research was done with the aim of explaining the dimensions and components of knowledge governance in the organization with a systemic approach. The current research was conducted with a qualitative approach and a meta-synthesis method. In this research, 451 related scientific sources were selected from various internal and external sources in the period before 2022, and using the meta-synthesis method and the use of "Critical Appraisal Skills Program" (CASP), finally 105 scientific researches were selected in line with the goal of the research. were evaluated and reviewed. In this regard, by applying a systemic approach and using the open coding method, relevant codes were identified and extracted in three main categories including input, process and output. The findings of the research show that the input of the model includes the nature of organizational knowledge governance (approach, nature and subject). Also, the governance process of organizational knowledge includes requirements, effective factors, obstacles and tools. The output of the obtained organizational knowledge governance model also includes functions and achievements. The topic (conceptual model of organizational knowledge governance) and the approach (system approach) of the current research have an innovative and unique aspect. The results of the present research can facilitate the implementation of knowledge governance in organizations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge governance
  • Organizational knowledge governance
  • systematic approach
  • meta synthesis
Bergdahl, E. (2019). Is meta‐synthesis turning rich descriptions into thin reductions? A criticism of meta‐aggregation as a form of qualitative synthesis. Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), e12273. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12273
Bernsteiner, R., Dilger, T., & Ploder, C. (2020). A knowledge governance framework for open innovation projects. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, 15(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWET.2020.109731
Boghrati, F., ShamiZanjani, M., & Manian, A. (2019). Designing a conceptual framework for knowledge governance in project-based organizations. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 4(2), 129-150. [In Persian]
Dalkir, K. (2022). Knowledge Governance: Addressing Complexity throughout the Knowledge Processing Cycle. In Knowledge Governance and Learning for Organizational Creativity and Transformation (pp. 15-34).
Danaei, N., Namdarzadegan, M., & Zare, R. (2020). Investigating the impact of knowledge governance on project performance: Explaining the moderating role of social processes and the mediating role of knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 10(3), 91-107. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.24767220.1399.10.3.4.9 [In Persian]
de Wit, F., Lourenço, A., Moreira, H., & Vala, F. (2022, September). Towards Knowledge Governance in Public Administration. In 23rd European Conference on Knowledge Management Vol 1. Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
Erwin, E.J. Brotherson, M.J., & Summers, J.A. (2011). Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33 (3), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111425493
Fathi, M. R., Sadeghi, M. R., & Khosravi, A. (2020). Assessing the Level of Organizational Readiness to Implement Knowledge Management (Case study: a Military University). Military Science and Tactics, 16(53), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.22034/qjmst.2020.240246. [In Persian]
Foos, N, J. (2007). The emerging knowledge governance approach: Challenges and characteristics. Organization, 14(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407071859
Foss, N. J. (2005). The knowledge governance approach. Available at SSRN 981353.
Foss, N. J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2010). Exploring knowledge governance. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 2(2-3), 93-101.
Freire, P., Dandolini, G. A., de Souza, J. A., Caetano Silva, T., & Moreira Couto, R. (2017). Governança do Conhecimento (GovC): o estado da arte sobre o termo. Biblios, (69), 21-40. DOI: 10.5195/biblios.2017.469.
Ghodoosi, M. R., Mahmudi, J., Musakhani, M., & Jafari, M. (2019). Proposing knowledge governance framework in social networks. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 5(1), 15-39. [In Persian]
Ghorbanizadeh, V., Mohammadi, M. Y. (2012). Knowledge management model in police organization. Quarterly of Police Management Research, 7(3), 328-345. [In Persian]
Hosseini Shavoon, A., Youzbashi, A., & Nasl Seraji, R. (2015). Condition of knowledge management and factors affecting its establishment in Tehran Uni-versity of Medical Sciences. [In Persian]
Kavalić, M., Nikolić, M., Radosav, D., Stanisavljev, S., & Pečujlija, M. (2021). Influencing factors on knowledge management for organizational sustainability. Sustainability, 13(3), 1497.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031497
Matić, D., Cabrilo, S., Grubić-Nešić, L., & Milić, B. (2017). Investigating the impact of organizational climate, motivational drivers, and empowering leadership on knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15, 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0063-9
Mohammadi, M., & Hajipour, B. (2020). Identifying coopetition model in Iran Automotive industry based on systematic approach: A case study of Iran Khodro Company. Public Management Researches, 13(47), 275-306. Doi: 10.22111/jmr.2020.25664.4050. [In Persian]
Múnera-Roldán, C., Roux, D. J., Colloff, M. J., & van Kerkhoff, L. (2020). Beyond calendars and maps: rethinking time and space for effective knowledge governance in protected areas. Land, 9(9), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090293
Neysi, A., Rangbari Kheini, M., (2009) Investigating effective factors in the successful establishment of knowledge management (case study: Telecommunication Organization of Khuzestan Province). Management Perspective, 33, 125-142. [In Persian]
Parsa, Omidali., Askari, Gholamreza., & Pazoukinejad, Ebrahim. (2023). Applying mechanism design theory to implement the desired outcome of knowledge management in research organizations. Journal of Organizational Knowledge Management, 6(1), 95-128. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.26454262.1402.6.1.3.4 [In Persian]
Pemsel, S., Wiewiora, A., Müller, R., Aubry, M., & Brown, K. (2014). A conceptualization of knowledge governance in project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1411-1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.010
Pereira, R., Malvestiti, R., Cunha, C., & Dandolini, G. (2019, December). The interrelationship between knowledge governance and absorptive capacity: A necessary convergence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning (pp. 291-296).
Pereira, R., Vechi, S., Malvestiti, R., & Santos, N. D. (2022). Beyond organizational knowledge: Governance mechanisms applied to knowledge-intensive organizations. In Knowledge Governance and Learning for Organizational Creativity and Transformation (pp. 55-73)
Pinho, I. (2016, July). Knowledge governance and university research center. In Eduardo Tomé (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy (p. 47-54).
Pinho, I., Costa, A. P., & Pinho, C. (2022). Evidence use as a tool for knowledge-based decisison process. 17th IFKAD-International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics, Lugano, Switzerland, 20-22 June. Pp.70-80
Pinho, I., Pinho, C., & Costa, A. P. (2019). Knowledge governance: Building a conceptual framework. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 8(1), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2019v8i1
Qayyum, M. A., & Khan, A. (2022). Knowledge Governance to Create Socially Understanding Communities. In Knowledge Governance and Learning for Organizational Creativity and Transformation (pp. 135-150).
Safavi, M., & Håkanson, L. (2018). Advancing theory on knowledge governance in universities: a case study of a higher education merger. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 500-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1180675
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV‐positive women. Research In Nursing & Health, 26(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10072
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing.
Shamizanjani, M., & Farzaneh Kondori, N. (2022). Identifying structural factors for realizing knowledge governance by combination of meta-synthesize and Delphi method. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 34(3), 1125-1154. Doi: 10.35050/JIPM010.2019.034 [In Persian]
Sharma, R. R., & Phookan, H. (2022). Interpersonal knowledge transfer within the multinational enterprise: incorporating identity based quasi-formal knowledge governance mechanisms. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 29 (2), 448 – 468. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-08-2021-0143.
Sohrabi, B., Yazdani, H. R., Ershadi, M. J., & Dorvash, S. (2022). Recognition and systemic analysis of data quality methodologies and proposing a comprehensive framework using the meta-synthesis method. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 36(3), 737-766. https://doi.org/10.52547/jipm.36.3.737. [In Persian]
Vahidi, H., & Danesh, Z. (2022). Challenges to implementing knowledge management in iranian organizations: a finding based on ultra combination method. Journal of Organizational knowledge Management, 5(1), 73-106. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.26454262.1401.5.1.3.7 [In Persian]
Van Kerkhoff, L. (2014). Knowledge governance for sustainable development: a review. Challenges in sustainability, 1(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.12924/cis2014.01020082
Zarepour, J., & Aliari, S., & Mahmoodi, J. (2019). Designing a framework for knowledge governance in khatam al-anbia construction site. Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 2(4), 11-43. Doi: 20.1001.1.26454262.1398.2.1.1.4. [In Persian]