Relationship between Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management in Academic Libraries (Case Study: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz)

Document Type : Case study

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of Information Science and epistemology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Information Science and epistemology. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

3 Master’s of information science and epistemology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

This study involves an investigation of the relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management in the libraries of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. This is an applied research following simultaneous mixed method. In the qualitative part of this study, the researchers employed Jierdzhi’s phenomenological approach. Semi-structured exploratory interviews were used to collect qualitative information, being conducted face-to-face. The statistical sample of this section was made on the basis of purposive sampling being continued until theoretical saturation. Interviews were made with 15 managers and employees of Shahid Chamran University Library in Ahvaz. Note taking and recording were also used to record information based on the research protocol designed by the researchers. To conform the validity of the tools, a three-way method of data collection was used. Internal validity has been tested by purposeful sample selection based on rich data descriptions or information richness and lengthening the interview process for in-depth understanding of the subject. The reliability, validity and acceptability of the data were tested to confirm data preciseness. The qualitative data were analyzed by inductive method. The quantitative part of this research is descriptive-correlation. The statistical population includes all managers and staff of the libraries of Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz containing 47 individuals who were selected as statistical sample due to the limited number. The data were collected through two standard organizational culture questionnaire (Cameron & Quinn, 1996) and knowledge management questionnaire (Lawson, 2003). The face validity and content validity of the questionnaires were confirmed by 5 professors having more Regarding the normality of the data, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test the significance of the relationships, and the data were analyzed using SPSS 24 software. The results showed that the culture dominating the libraries is hierarchical. There is no meaningful relationship between this type of culture and knowledge management; however, there is a significant relationship between tribal or group culture, market culture and status-based culture with knowledge management. Also, the results of correlation analysis showed that group organizational culture has the highest correlation with knowledge management. It is suggested that the necessary framework for changing the hierarchical culture of the libraries under study into group culture be created so that knowledge management in these libraries can be more successfully implemented.

Keywords


Brooks, G. (2007). Organizational leadership in academic libraries: Identifying culture types and leadership roles. PhD Diss., Marshall University.
Cameron, K.S. & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. London: Reading MA
Chidambaranathan K. & Swarooprani B. S. (2017). Analyzing the relationship between organization culture an knowledge management dimensions in higher education libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(1), 57-68.
Davenport T. H. & Prusak, L. (1999). Working knowledge: how organization management what they know. Boston, MA: Harward Business school press, 17.
Goodman, E.; Zammuto, R. & Gifford, B. (2001). Organizational culture and quality of work life. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 6, 16-37.
Holowzki, A. (2002). The relationship between knowledge management and organizational culture. University of Oregon. Applied information mangemant program.
Kaarst-Brown, M., Nicholson, S., Dran, G. V., Stanton, J. (2004). Organizational culture of libraries as a strategic resource. Library Trends, 53 (1), 33-52.
Kangas, L. M. (2005). An assessment of the relationship between organizational culture and continuous knowledge management initiatives. A dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the reguirments for the degree doctor of philosophy, capella university.
Kianto, A. & Vanhala M., and Pia Heilmann. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. Journal of Knowledge Management. 20 (4), 621-636, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1367-3270.
King, N. (2004). Using interviews in quatitative research. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, 2, 11-22.
Li Bing, Zhang, J. & Zhang X. (2013). Knowledge management organizational culture: an exploratory study, creative and knowledge scocity. International Scientific Journal, 3(1), 65- 77.
Meek, V. (1998). Organization culture: origins and weaknesses. Journal of organization studies, 9 (4), 453-473.
Nisara Tahir M, Prabhakarb G. (2019). Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations. Journal of Business Research, 94, 264–272. Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres.
 Porumbeanu, O. (2010). Implementing knowledge management in Romanian academic libraries: Identifying the elements that characterize their organizational culture. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 549–552.
Quinn, R. & Spritzer, G. M. (2001). The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of corporate culture quality of life in R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds). Resaerch in Organizational Change and Development, 5, 115-142.
Shepson, C. & Curri, L. (2008). Perspectives on: transformation the academic library: creating an organizational culture that fosters staff success. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34 (4), 358-368.
Volume 2, Issue 3 - Serial Number 6
Serial No.6- Autumn Quarterly
December 2019
Pages 111-137
  • Receive Date: 27 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 21 September 2019
  • Accept Date: 30 November 2019