An Analysis of Local and Global Trends of the Knowledge Auditing in the Citation Analysis Database of Clarivate Analytics

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD candidate at the Department of Information of Science and Epistemology, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant professor at the Department of Information of Science and Epistemology, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Knowledge auditing is essential for assessing knowledge management processes and adapting them with the organizational goals. On the other hand, analyzing the process of KM at local and global levels helps to identify the gaps in this field. This is an applied research which follows descriptive-analytical and scientometric methods. The statistical population of this research includes 84 ISI qualified articles of knowledge auditing in the Clarivate Analytics citation database. Data collection tools included checklists and annotation lists, and data analysis co-citation maps were performed by HisCite, VOS viewer, Pajek and Excel software. Findings showed that the publication trends of the knowledge auditing articles has fluctuated through time, and the most frequent article topics related to business finance, management, library and information science, and general and internal medicine. The number of local citations of countries, organizations, authors, journals and topics is very low compared to global citations. Findings also showed that most articles were published in English, and that the United States, England and Canada had the most publication of local and global citations. Universities of Colorado, Alabama, Waterloo and Cornell, and the Journals of Practice and Theory, Accounting Review and Auditing- had the most local and global citations respectively.  Co-occurrence maps of the keywords of this area are not coherent. Moreover, among the authors, Bonner, Libby, DeZoort and Salterio composed the most frequently cited at local and global fields. Centrality networks, and close relationship among the authors were not at an acceptable level requiring better planning and policy making.

Keywords

References

Abdul Rahman, A and Shukor, Nur Syufiza Ahmad. (2012). Knowledge Audit Roles and Contributions towards Continuous Quality Improvement : A Review. Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe) Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 93-97.
Borner, K. (2010). Atlas of science: visualizing what we know. Retrieved from netLibrary: http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/defult.asp?tlype=2&tid=12344  [7 October 2010].
Buchanan, S. and Gibb, F. (2007). The information audit: Role and scope. International journal of information management, 27(3), 159-172.
Che Pa, N, Taheri L and Abdullah, R. (2012).  A Survey on Approaches in Knowledge Audit in Organizations. Asian Transactions on Computers (ATC), 2(5), 1-8.
Cheung, C. F., Li, M. L., Shek, W. Y., Lee, W. B., & Tsang, T. S. (2007). A systematic approach for knowledge auditing: a case study in transportation sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 140-158.
Dattero, R. (2006). Collaboration between the top knowledge management/intellectual capital researchers. Knowledge and Process Management, 13 (4), 264-269.
Henczel, S. (2000). The Information Audit as a First Step towards Effective Knowledge Management. An Opportunity For The Special Librarian. Proceeding of Global 2000 Worldwide Conference on Special Librarianship, 210-226.
Jaber Ansari, A. (2018). A COMPREHENSIVE MODEL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AUDIT BASED ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW IN 7 STAGES. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 4(5), 74-79.
Liebowitz J., Rubenstein-Montano B., McCaw D., Buchwalter J., Browning C. (2000). The knowledge audit. Knowledge and Process Management, 7(1), 3-10.
Noyons, E. C. (1999). Bibliometric Mapping as a Science Policy and Research Management Tool. Leiden: DSWO Press.
Perez-Soltero, B. Valenzuela, et al. (2006). Knowledge Audit Methodology With Emphasis on Core Processes. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS), Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain.
Perez‐Soltero, A., Barcelo‐Valenzuela, M., Sanchez‐Schmitz, G., Martin‐Rubio, F., Palma‐Mendez, J. T., & Vanti, A. A. (2007). A model and methodology to knowledge auditing considering core processes. ICFAI Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 7–23.
Ponzi, L.J. (2002). The intellectual structure and interdisciplinary breadth of knowledge management: a bibliometric study of its early stage of development, Scientometrics, 55 (2), 259-72.
Serrat, O. (2008). Learning Lessons with Knowledge Audits. Malaysian Evaluation Society’s Third International Evaluation Conference Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Serenko, A. and Bontis, N. (2004). Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge and Process Management, 11 (3), 185-98.
Serenko, A and Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307-326.
Serenko, A and Bontis, N. (2017). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 675-692.
Taheri, L., Che Pa, N., Abdullah, R., and Abdullah S. (2014). A knowledge audit model for requirement elicitation process. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 8(2), 452-456.
Taheri, L., Che Pa, N., Abdullah, R., & Abdullah S. (2015). A knowledge audit model to assess the knowledge in requirement elicitation process. In The 9th Malaysian Sotware Engineering Conference, Dec. 2015. pp.106–111.
Taheri, L., Shafazand, M.Y., Che Pa, N., Abdullah, R. and Abdullah, S. (2017). A knowledge audit model for requirement elicitation: A case study to assess knowledge in requirement elicitation. Knowledge Process Management, 24, 257–268.
Tiwana, A. (1999). The Knowledge Management Toolkit, Prentice Hall. Available at: http://sgpwe.izt.uam.mx/files/users/uami/dml/Tiwana_Amrit_1999_Knowledge_Management_Toolkit1.pdf, Accessed: 94.08.24.
Wu, Ying-liang and LI, Yi-hua. (2008). Research on the Model of Knowledge Audit. Retrieved, 2019/06/12, from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org
Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge
Volume 2, Issue 3 - Serial Number 6
September 2019
Pages 11-46

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 October 2019
  • Revise Date: 05 November 2019
  • Accept Date: 02 December 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics