Designing an Open Innovation Model in Active Small and Medium Sized Enterprises through Grounded Theory (Case Study: Food Industries in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province)

Document Type : Case study

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Department of Managment, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.

3 Master of Public Administration, Department of Managment, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

10.47176/smok.2018.95136

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is designing an open innovation model in active small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of national food industries. The research is conducted through grounded theory method. Semi-structured interviews with 25 managers (practical field) and academic experts (scientific field), selected by theoretical sampling method, were used for creating the sample. Codes and components of open innovation (355 key concepts, 34 sub-categories, and 11 main aspects) were derived from the interviews and were codified in a conceptual model based on grounded theory. Based on the research findings, the central category was “open innovation”. The casual conditions contained two dimensions, namely internal factors (key capabilities, organizational dimensions, modern research, management of intellectual property management, characteristics of SMEs, and characteristics of food industries). External factors contained business model and environmental changes. The desired strategies contained facilitative strategies (searching, boundary-spanning, outsourcing, networking, monitoring partnership), technological opportunities strategies including input, output, and interactional. The contextual conditions included organizational strategies (manager’s personal characteristics and cultural infrastructures), and the environmental conditions (market dynamism and legal infrastructure). The interfering conditions affected strategies via challenges of resources, dynamic capabilities and uncertainty. Finally, they led to internal consequences (improvement of organizational preparation, recruitment capacity and cultural infrastructures), external consequences (observation, environmental intelligence, improvement of business model, improvement of cooperation capabilities and improvement of outsourcing), and interactional consequences (co-creation).

Keywords

References

  • Arcese G, Flammini S, Martucci O. (2013). Dall’Innovazione Alla Startup—L’esperienza D’imprenditori Italiani in Italia e in California. McGraw-Hill: Milan, Italy.
  • Arcese G, Flammini S, Caludia-Lucchetti M, Martucci O. (2015). Evidence and Experience of Open Sustainability Innovation Practices in the Food Sector. Sustainability, 7: 8067-8090.
  • Bellairs J. (2010). Open innovation gaining momentum in the food industry. Cereal Foods World, 55 (1): 4-6.
  • Brunswicker S, Vanhaverbeke W. (2014). Open Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management.
  • Crema M, Verbano C, Venturini K. (2014). Linking strategy with open innovation and performance in SMEs. Measuring Business Excellence, 18 (2):14 – 27.
  • Chesbrough HW. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3): 35-41.
  • Chesbrough H, Crowther AK. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36 (3): 229-236.
  • Chesbrough HW. (2006). Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation, New York, Oxford University Press: 1–34.
  • Chesbrough H, Garman A. (2009). How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. Harvard Business Review, 87 (12): 68-76.
  • Creswell JW. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: sage publications.
  • Ettlinger N. (2017). Open innovation and its discontents, Geoforum, 80: 61–71
  • Gassmann O, Enkel E, Chesbrough HW. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40 (3): 213-219.
  • Grimaldi M, Quinto I, Rippa P. (2013). Enabling Open Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach, Knowledge and Process Management, 20 (4): 199–210.
  • Hossain M. Kauranen I. (2016). Open innovation in SMEs: a systematic literature review. Journal of Strategy and Management, 9 (1): 58-73.
  • Huizingh EK. 2011. Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31 (1): 2–9.
  • Kamalian A, Rashki M, Arbabi ML. (2011). Barriers to Innovation among Iranian SMEs. Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(2): 79-90.
  • Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews – An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Keupp MM, Gassmann O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 39 (4): 331–341.
  • Khan RS, Grigor J, Winger R, Win A. (2013). Functional food product development dopportunities and challenges for food manufacturers. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 30 (1): 27-37.
  • Lee S, Park G, Yoon B, Park J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs – an intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39 (2): 290-300.
  • Lichtenthaler U. (2011). Open innovation: Past Research, Current Debates and Future Directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (1): 75–93.
  • Omta SWF, Fortuin FTJM, Dijkman NC. (2014). Open Innovation in the Food Industry: An Evidence Based Guide, ISBN 978-908-222-12-06, Netherlands: 1-58.
  • Pervan S, Al-Ansaari Y, Xu J. (2015). Environmental determinants of open innovation in Dubai SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 50: 60-68.
  • Popa S, Soto-Acosta P, Martinez-Conesa I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 118: 134-142.
  • Portilla AR. (2016). The unexpected implications of opening up innovation: A multi-perspective study of the role of Open Innovation practices in mature industries, Doctoral Thesis, School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Department of Industrial Economics and Management, Politecnico di Milano.
  • Saguy S, Sirotinskaya V. (2014). Challenges in exploiting open innovation’s full potential in the food industry with a focus on small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Trends in Food Science & Technology, 38: 136-148.
  • Saguy IS. (2011). Paradigm shifts in academia and the food industry required to meet innovation challenges. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 22 (9): 467-475.
  • Schroll A, Mild A. (2012). A critical review of empirical research on open innovation adoption. Journal Für Betriebswirtschaft, 62 (2): 85–118.
  • Spithoven A, VanhaverbekeW, Roijakkers N. (2013). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41 (3): 537-562.
  • Stanisławski R, Lisowska R. (2015). The Relations between Innovation Openness (Open Innovation) and the Innovation Potential of SMEs, 2nd Global Conference on Business, Economics, Management, 23: 1521-1526.
  • Striukova L, Rayna T. (2015). University-industry knowledge exchange. European, Journal of Innovation Management, 18 (4): 471- 492.
  • Traitler H, Watzke HJ, Saguy IS. (2011). Reinventing R&D in an open innovation ecosystem. Journal of Food Science, 76 (2): 62-68.
  • West J, Salter A, Vanhaverbeke W, Chesbrough H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade, Research Policy, 43: 805–811.
  • Won Park Y, Amano T, Moon G. (2012). Benchmarking open and cluster innovation: case of Korea. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19 (4): 517-531.
  • Zhang J, Zeng J. 2009. An Open Innovation Model for Business Innovation of Chinese Telecom Operators. National Natural Science Foundation of China. International Conference on Management and Service Science, 20-22 Sept, China ,1-5.
Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge
Volume 1, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
September 2018
Pages 95-136

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 September 2018
  • Revise Date: 22 January 2019
  • Accept Date: 27 October 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics